Occasionally, when running Linux (and I'm doing this in the context of a 64-bit install of Ubuntu 10.04), you'll run across software that claims to officially support only Sun's Java, and not the standard OpenJDK that comes with Ubuntu (and, of course, other Linux distros). Do you need to take that warning seriously? Why not test it for yourself?
Again, working within the context of my Ubuntu system, install both the Sun Java 6 JDK and OpenJDK 6:
$ sudo add-apt-repository "deb http://archive.canonical.com/ lucid partner" $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get install sun-java6-jdk openjdk-6-jdk
now check which one is currently "active":
$ java -version java version "1.6.0_20" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode) $
That's telling you that, at the moment, all invocations of Java will use Sun's JVM, but you can switch back and forth using the
First, list all of the JVM alternatives:
$ update-java-alternatives -l java-6-openjdk 1061 /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk java-6-sun 63 /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun $
At this point, you can switch to using OpenJDK and verify that that's the new active JVM:
$ sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-openjdk update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for mozilla-javaplugin.so. update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for xulrunner-1.9-javaplugin.so. update-java-alternatives: plugin alternative does not exist: \ /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so $
And, yes, it's entirely possible that you'll get some errors since you might still need to install related packages to go along with whatever JVM you selected, but you can verify that you're now using your newly-selected JVM:
$ java -version java version "1.6.0_18" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.8) (6b18-1.8-4ubuntu3) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.0-b13, mixed mode) $
At this point, resume running your software and, if it seems to work fine, you can continue using OpenJDK. If not, just switch back to Sun's Java.